December 1, 2007 has come and gone, which means that this wild and crazy season is over. No one was great, everyone claimed to be good, and we are left with a system that is designed to give us a 1 vs. 2 game—based on the opinions of 167 people who don’t watch every game and 6 computer formulas that cannot explain how they derive their formula so that a normal person who’s not an MIT scientist can understand it. So, based on what we saw all season, LSU and Ohio State are playing for the BcS Title. I want to throw up.

I am a pro-playoff guy and have been since I became aware that this is a sport and not a beauty contest. For 10 seasons, we have seen the BcS change its stripes more times than I care to count and each time against the wishes of most college football fans. I have finally had it. I don’t want a Plus-One; that just means that this year Virginia Tech gets in for beating no one except for a BC team they already lost to, and OU (my #2 team) would be in semi-finals against the alleged #1 and #2 teams. What a crock.

I want an 8-team playoff. I know 16 will never happen and I think that given a season like this, where 8 teams can say they should have a shot at showing they are the best, we should give them the opportunity. If not, then go back to the old beauty contest way with traditional bowl match-ups; Ohio State vs. USC in the Rose, LSU vs. Georgia in the Sugar (since they didn’t play during the regular season), Oklahoma vs. Virginia Tech in the Orange Bowl (why did the Big 12 get hosed out of Miami for New Year’s for Phoenix?) and West Virginia vs. Missouri in the Fiesta Bowl. The season was amazing from day 1 with Appalachian State beating Michigan in Ann Arbor and it has propelled them on to the semi-finals of the Division 1-AA playoffs. See, all of the other kids are supposed to be the same but big time football is the sacred cow and apparently no would be excited about Ohio State hosting Kansas, LSU hosting USC, Virginia Tech vs. Missouri and Georgia at Oklahoma. Very sad that a sport that is just the best for 3 full months becomes irrelevant in 24 hours.

Now on to the Trojans: I was not a believer as many of you know. I felt that the “Dwarf from Shreveport” would never take this team anywhere and that we were destined for 9-3 and a trip to San Diego. Well the injury bug struck every Pac-10 contender and so we got another BcS trip and a 4th Rose Bowl in 6 years along with a 6th consecutive conference title. This team came on late and really looked good on for a half against ASU and 3 quarters against Nebraska. That was really it—the rest of the season the offensive play calling was inconsistent and the defense had to make just enough plays so the team got wins. I am not sure if the offense was so underwhelming because of the Dwarf’s inability to execute the plays, or Sarkisian feeling that he was the smartest guy there and thinking that no matter what we should throw all the time. The other thing I never got is why Stafon Johnson didn’t get more carries—either he was really injured or again Pete gave his seniors the benefit of the doubt sticking with Chauncey all season and Booty against Stanford.

The whole season for USC really boils down to the last 4 minutes of the Stanford game. They had a great game plan for SC and we played right into by being to confident in our offense. Three runs and a punt and we sneak out with a win because they were not going 80 yards against our defense with no time outs. Meanwhile, we would be 11-1 and playing Ohio State. But we were not smart enough to figure out that stats aren’t important wins are. Oh well, now we can find out if it was really the “Dwarf” that held this team back as in ’08 they will start the season in the Top 5 and we will see if Sanchez or Mustain are ready to fill the shoes of Matt Leinart who is the gold standard for SC QB play. Until we do the fans will not be satisfied and we will keep playing against crappy Big-10 teams in the Rose Bowl as the reward for the season instead of for National Championships in the craptacular system that we have to deal with in my opinion for another 7 years minimum. (Thanks Tournament of Roses Committee for a deal with ABC through 2014).

4 Responses to “2007 Post Mortem: College Football and USC”

  1. Jared Says:

    And the award for the Most Dour College Football Blogger of the year goes to…….. CommishRob!

  2. Joe Says:

    Commish,

    I think you make some valid points. The running game needs a little more of Stafon Johnson (and maybe C.J. Gable when healthy) and Joe McKnight next year should only get better. The Stanford loss is especially bitter considering how many teams stumbled down the stretch. ‘SC would have definitely found themselves in the title game with just one loss to Oregon.

    But I think those of us who are ‘SC fanatics have become a little spoiled. Although it’s almost a decade ago, let’s remember what it was like before Pete arrived. The Trojans could be on the verge of completing a second straight “disappointing” season with a second straight Rose Bowl win.

  3. Tristan Says:

    C-Rob,

    What? Ain’tcha got no love for Bradford?

    I couldn’t agree with a fellow Trojan-fan any more than you CommishRob. On all points. I’ll go further- I think Sark sucks. If I can equate him to music, he’s like “candy-rave” to “SF-house”. Meaning, he’s got all these angles, themes, and disparate highly technical razzle-dazzle, but he ain’t gots no “soul” behind it all. It’s like he’s not “feeling the beat” or something. Just goes full-steam ahead to absolutely nowhere. If he could put together something with a solid groove and feel his way through the cadence and rhythm of a game. He blows it more times than not. (what’s with running off-tackle on 3rd and long ALL THE TIME? it’s like a freaky “groundhog day” every friggin 3rd down. I got a diamond in my crack over his lameness. That’s the bad news. The good news is, I still have my sweet-ass 54″ television. Haven’t broken the flock out of yet through my Sark-frustrations)

    I hope you’re getting paid CommishRob. I totally dig your show.

  4. Greg D Says:

    I agree with you..but I want to comment on 08. By the end of the season I think USC was the best. But they keep on loosing the big games. They seemed to have finally got it together by the end of the season but two defeats won’t get it done.

    Greg d

Leave a Reply