<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pac-10 Commish: No love for the Plus-One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.studentbodyright.com/2007/07/pac-10-commish-no-love-for-the-plus-one.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.studentbodyright.com/2007/07/pac-10-commish-no-love-for-the-plus-one.html</link>
	<description>Keeping fantasy football simple.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Student Body Right &#187; &#187; Stewie strikes back at Pac-10 Commish</title>
		<link>http://www.studentbodyright.com/2007/07/pac-10-commish-no-love-for-the-plus-one.html/comment-page-1#comment-20479</link>
		<dc:creator>Student Body Right &#187; &#187; Stewie strikes back at Pac-10 Commish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studentbodyright.com/2007/07/pac-10-commish-no-love-for-the-plus-one.html#comment-20479</guid>
		<description>[...] Pac-10 commissioner Tom Hansen has taken some heat recently for saying that the Pac-10 presidents would rather leave the BCS than support the Plus-One Model recently rumored.  Now, SI college football writer Stewie Mandel is calling Hansen&#8217;s bluff.  Mandel believes that Hansen is just talking out of is a** and that the Pac-10 would compromise eventually to guarantee that a Pac-10 team would have a shot at the National title instead of just playing in the Rose Bowl against a Big Eleven (soon to be MidWest 12?) opponent. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pac-10 commissioner Tom Hansen has taken some heat recently for saying that the Pac-10 presidents would rather leave the BCS than support the Plus-One Model recently rumored.  Now, SI college football writer Stewie Mandel is calling Hansen&#8217;s bluff.  Mandel believes that Hansen is just talking out of is a** and that the Pac-10 would compromise eventually to guarantee that a Pac-10 team would have a shot at the National title instead of just playing in the Rose Bowl against a Big Eleven (soon to be MidWest 12?) opponent. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Keeling</title>
		<link>http://www.studentbodyright.com/2007/07/pac-10-commish-no-love-for-the-plus-one.html/comment-page-1#comment-20255</link>
		<dc:creator>David Keeling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studentbodyright.com/2007/07/pac-10-commish-no-love-for-the-plus-one.html#comment-20255</guid>
		<description>It is well documented, conference commissioners are nothing more than a conference president&#039;s &quot;gofer&quot;. Unfortunately, Tom Hansen plays this role all too well and acts shameless at the same time. The PAC-10 TV package is an embarressment compared to all other BCS conference TV packages. (OLN my ass)It took the PAC-10 years to finally &quot;get it&quot; in playing games on ESPN. Name me one PAC-10 president that has said anything positive about college football? You can&#039;t. You can&#039;t even get them to talk about college football period. It&#039;s like the plague. Whoever mercifully replaces Tom Hansen will be required to be one thing, &quot;gutless&quot; and willing to stand before a microphone and with a straight face, claim a plus-one playoff is wrong and the PAC-10 will stomp off and take their &quot;toy&quot; with them. How immature grown men can be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is well documented, conference commissioners are nothing more than a conference president&#8217;s &#8220;gofer&#8221;. Unfortunately, Tom Hansen plays this role all too well and acts shameless at the same time. The PAC-10 TV package is an embarressment compared to all other BCS conference TV packages. (OLN my ass)It took the PAC-10 years to finally &#8220;get it&#8221; in playing games on ESPN. Name me one PAC-10 president that has said anything positive about college football? You can&#8217;t. You can&#8217;t even get them to talk about college football period. It&#8217;s like the plague. Whoever mercifully replaces Tom Hansen will be required to be one thing, &#8220;gutless&#8221; and willing to stand before a microphone and with a straight face, claim a plus-one playoff is wrong and the PAC-10 will stomp off and take their &#8220;toy&#8221; with them. How immature grown men can be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Cal OG</title>
		<link>http://www.studentbodyright.com/2007/07/pac-10-commish-no-love-for-the-plus-one.html/comment-page-1#comment-20229</link>
		<dc:creator>So Cal OG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studentbodyright.com/2007/07/pac-10-commish-no-love-for-the-plus-one.html#comment-20229</guid>
		<description>A &quot;plus-one&quot;, is not a 4-Team Playoff !!!

Lets get that straight, first.  A &quot;plus-one&quot; is the SAME thing we had before, except that you&#039;d pick the TWO Teams after the Bowls are played.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A &#8220;plus-one&#8221;, is not a 4-Team Playoff !!!</p>
<p>Lets get that straight, first.  A &#8220;plus-one&#8221; is the SAME thing we had before, except that you&#8217;d pick the TWO Teams after the Bowls are played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

